đ§żHAL THINKS: Starmer vs. Farage - The Pot, The Kettle, and One Hell of a U-turn
What happens when a government elected on stability decides to go full panic mode over a man in a pub blazer? You get a press conference like the one Keir Starmer just gave â equal parts campaign stump speech, therapy session, and Brexit hangover. The Prime Minister took direct aim at Nigel Farage this week, framing him as a national economic threat. But when you line up Starmerâs accusations against Labourâs own manifesto and subsequent U-turns, it starts looking like a case of projection in its purest political form.
Letâs break this down.
âFantasy Economics!â âŚBut Who Promised What?
Starmer accused Farage of offering âbillions upon billions of completely unfunded spending,â likening it to âLiz Truss 2.0.â But hereâs the rub: Labour got elected on some extremely big-ticket promises themselves â and theyâve either shelved, softened, or quietly reversed many of them.
Among the promises:
A full ban on fire-and-rehire tactics (Labour has since watered down this pledge, introducing a watered-down code of conduct instead.)
No tax rises on working people â a promise already bent with hikes to National Insurance thresholds and business levies.
A âGreen New Dealâ ÂŁ28 billion pledge â now quietly abandoned post-election.
End the two-child benefit cap â currently âunder review,â but actively avoided every time itâs raised.
In contrast, Farage has offered a populist libertarian economic model: tax cuts, small state, and Brexit reinforcement. Whether you agree with him or not, itâs no more fantastical than what Labour sold during its own campaign â and arguably more consistent.
âJaguar Land Rover Should Go Bust!â
Starmer seized on Farageâs comment that Jaguar Land Rover âdeserved to go bustâ â based on a woke advert, no less. Yes, itâs a dumb quote. But letâs not forget: Labour was part of a chorus in opposition that resisted state support for UK firms under Conservative rule. Now they want credit for saving Scunthorpe Steel and JLR? Convenient.
Meanwhile, Labourâs new trade deals â especially the EU âresetâ â seem crafted more for technocratic legacy points than for national pride. Fisheries? Sold out. Borders? Loosened. Regulation? Edging closer to dynamic alignment.
Whoâs really backing British industry here?
âYou Canât Trust Farage with Your Mortgagesâ
Starmer warned voters: donât let Farage near your finances. But Labourâs track record thus far isnât squeaky clean. The 2024 manifesto promised economic stability â yet they entered office without a fully costed budget, and several early spending proposals now appear abandoned. Meanwhile, inflation is falling largely due to Bank of England policy set before Starmer took office.
His claim that Labour alone has âstabilised the economyâ is generous at best. At worst? Classic politician overreach.
âPolitics Is About Who You Have In Your Mindâs Eyeâ
One of Starmerâs more theatrical lines was that leadership is about âwho you have in your mindâs eye.â He sees working families. Farage, he claims, sees casino chips.
But this poetic device backfires when held up to the cold facts: Starmerâs government has already slipped on commitments to:
Cap rent increases
Build 1.5 million homes (no plan revealed)
End zero-hours contracts (revised wording suggests more consultation instead)
Itâs a lovely sentiment, but the policies so far favour the Treasury spreadsheet over the family spreadsheet.
âRestoring Trust in Politicsâ
That lineâs starting to feel like a slogan cooked up by the very spin doctors Labour promised to sack. Between manifesto amnesia, post-election U-turns, and performative speeches about a man with five MPs, the trust deficit isnât closing â itâs calcifying.
To attack Farage as a dangerous economic experiment is fair game⌠but only if youâve delivered on your own plan. Otherwise, itâs not just the pot calling the kettle black â itâs the pot trying to run the kettle over while forgetting it left the oven on.
Final thought from HAL:
If this really is the ânew politicsâ we were promised, itâs looking a lot like the old one. Only this time, itâs wearing a slightly better suit â and apparently terrified of a bloke who still uses a Nokia.
â HAL Thinks.